Sometimes it’s fun to experiment, try something new. I gave a few tools in Photoshop a spin and here is the result:
Not everything I did to get this final result was new to me, but because certain steps were, this photo took some time to produce. A typical learning curve with any thing that is new. I started with this photo, shot in the early morning. The sun was up the sky was beautiful, but the streetlights were still on and even the traffic had a sleepy feel to it.
The first few edits were pretty basic. I cropped and straightened the photo. Then I removed the wire you can see in the sky with the healing tool. Then I sharpened the photo. This is the color version that contains the sky that is in the final version:
From here I wanted to make a black and white version. I find that sometimes if you boost things like saturation and vibrance in a color version it ends up being over the top in color:
But quite nice in black and white:
I then put my nice color version and the black and white version in Photoshop. At this point the photograph was two layers, black and white on top and color underneath.
With the selection tool, I picked out the area of the sky in the top layer, made a mask, then inverted the mask. This had the effect of revealing the color sky underneath. This was by far the longest step in the process. I don’t have a whole lot of experience with the selection tool, it can be a bit stubborn and add in things you don’t want in your selection. I’m not a patient person. I would like everything to work correctly the first time, thank you very much. I will say that this tool is one that has improved over the years. When I got that part of the effect to where I wanted it, I then dropped the opacity of the black and white layer to 95%. This brings in just a hint of the warmth of the color version that is on the second layer. It also the same tone as the sky, so it makes the two layers clash less and work more as a single image.
What do you think of my final image? Do you have an image editing tool that you avoid because it drive you crazy? Feel free to leave a comment below.
Cheers!
Thanks for taking the time to share this process. I’m definitely not a Photoshop pro and this is so helpful!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This type of post I write in part for myself, so I can refer back to it. In this case, the use of the selection tool in combination with a mask, has a lot of applications, I would just need to remember how to do it 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I love the top photo, but I like the third one the best. The buildings benefit from having some color, especially the cathedral (?) at the end of the street. I love reading the process and especially the decisions you made at each step 👍
LikeLike
OMG It’s the Vatican 🙈 I just saw it in your Instagram gallery
LikeLike
You got it 🙂 Also, thanks for stopping by on Instagram.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, that’s part of the reason I put the different versions in this post, I figured that different versions would appeal to different people, something that I find interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The various blending modes within Photoshop drive me nuts! I think if I could get my head around them it would be an asset for exploring double exposure within Photoshop, sigh…maybe someday
LikeLike
I have a hard time keeping them all straight as well. Blending modes are one of the functions of Photoshop that I have a set idea of what I use them for, but really they are capable of a lot of other things.
LikeLike
Pingback: WPC and the Second Experiment | Lillie-Put
Thank you, it remembers me at the fact that we make agreements to unify what we see. And we think, that we see the same. But we do not…
The way how we hear, feel, smell and see our outside world is different like every face of human at all…*
LikeLike
I think they are all great, and it is great to follow your work flow. I am not so good at more than the basics in PS. The final photo is beautiful – a good choice.
LikeLike
Thank you, I was pleased with the outcome. In this case I thought it would be helpful to write out my steps so that I could do that again.
LikeLike
Clever. If I do something in PS I cannot do the same thing again…
LikeLike
Yes, I find it maddening when I can’t remember the details, so this is my way of writing them down.
LikeLike
I think I will borrow that idea..
LikeLike
🙂
LikeLike
Love it. I think the beauty of the sky would not have translated well in b&w. So, I agree with your edit here. 😊
LikeLike
Thank you, it is true when I was creating the black and white version, I did not get a sky that I liked as much as the original color version.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really like the final version. BW, but not entirely BW and colour, but not entirely colour. I also have some trouble with the selection tool in Adobe and sometimes it doesn’t select what I want it to. Like you said, for me it sometimes selects another part automatically – and I get the feeling it is being oversensitive at times.
LikeLike
Yes, and for some reason I am over sensitive about it being over sensitive 🙂
LikeLike
LOL. That’s a nice way to put it. Sometimes when the selection tool selects more than I want, I undo it and then it STILL selects more than I want. Zooming in the photo helps me to select what I want better.
LikeLike
Yes, zooming in can help. I also find that this tool seems to work better sometimes than others for reasons I don’t quite understand. It almost seems to find certain photos more perplexing, but honestly not in an even way where it would be possible to say something like, “this tool is easier to use when your selection is a man-made structure”.
LikeLike
I’ve always found this tool better at selecting things that are well lit or if objects are well defined and not overlapping or blending into one another in terms of colour and shades. If I’m trying to select something that is shaded, like in low light, then it gets trickier.
LikeLike
Pingback: Experimental: Passing on the Horizon 3 – What's (in) the picture?
Oh my gosh, I love the final image. I especially liked how it masked out the loud billboard-style advert on the right of the street in the color version in the foreground, and the distracting red brake lights and stoplights along the street toward the dome. Great eye, creative layering, and great composition, Amy!
LikeLike
Thank you very much. I agree that billboard was troublesome. I wanted it muted, but not dropped from the photo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really excellent result. I was thinking to myself yesterday as I was driving and your photo crossed my mind, it’s your artistry, adding in the color just above the dome but muting it elsewhere, including the billboard. Congrats!
LikeLike
Thanks 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, and your question about impatience with a tool reminds me of something I’ve been struggling with lately in my writing. I’m writing a revision of a story (on request from the market), and I can see where I want to get with the piece, but it takes some time to sort it out exactly. I’d love to just wave a hand and have it come out perfect. hah! 🙂
LikeLike
Yes, exactly this same idea, just have it perfect already 🙂 Like it is ever that easy…
LikeLiked by 2 people
like it is EVER that easy, Amy! Hah! thanks! 🙂
LikeLike
LOVE the final image – and It seems you are a bit more patient than many !
LikeLike
Thank you 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow. Great job.
LikeLike
Thank you very much!
LikeLike
I love love love this, Amy! When you show us how you achieve such beautiful results, I am truly inspired to try to improve my photo taking!
Your original is stunning! And your final piece is so mysteriously surreal!
LikeLike
Thank you so much, I’m glad you enjoyed this version.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exquisite!
LikeLike
Thank you 🙂
LikeLike
I can’t justify the expense of Photoshop – and GIMP is open source and thus free. But equally frustrating to use sometimes! Well done.
I also recognize the location – Vatican City.
LikeLike
I have some experience with GIMP and I did find it frustrating to use. Photoshop is not only an expense but also an investment of time. I can easily understand when folks do not want to deal with the expense.
LikeLike
Taking the extra time usually is very satisfying.
LikeLike
I agree, even if it is something that seems like a failure right in the moment, I often can come back another time and pick up where I left off.
LikeLike
I don’t think you, or any photographer, needs a final image. They’re all good.
LikeLike
Thank you very much.
LikeLike
That is a remarkable editing process! Thank you for sharing. 🙂
LikeLike
Thanks Amy!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice pic. I think you might end up with the same results with Lightroom with far fewer steps.
LikeLike
I’d have to look into that. I’ll be honest, I’m not as likely to use Lightroom for editing because they layout of the tools seems a bit less straightforward than they are in Photoshop. I tend to use Lightroom more for finishing touches and as a way to organize my photos. Thanks for taking the time to comment, I do appreciate it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LR sis for workflows ans doesn’t spoil negatives. PS is for finishing touches
LikeLike
Pingback: All Kinds of Things Going On | Photography Journal Blog
Pingback: All Kinds of Things Going On | Photography Journal Blog