Photography rules that is. One of them, that I only heard a few months ago, was that you have to have an uneven number of objects. Two of something would be “wrong”. Here is my wrong photo:
ISO 160 f/5.6 1/40 135mm
I think two works in this case. Given the distance the birds were from me, this is the sharpest shot I was able to get. It is fine for this format, but I can tell you that it wouldn’t work very well as a large print. I did crop this photo. I also changed the saturation values and sharpened it.
Cheers!
Photography Journal Blog 
Haven’t heard that one personally – but breaking the Rule of Thirds is often viewed as something you do at your peril. I usually find that rule works for landscape, architecture and posed portraits but falls down with things like sports photography.
Looks like you had a window to contend with on this one too, which doesn’t help!
LikeLike
In this case, it was actually a wire fence. I tried to get as close as possible to blur it out of the photo, but that is the glass like glare you are seeing. Just one more thing to contend with 🙂
LikeLike